Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:21 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:16:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > In order to get rid of legacy platform data in AT25 driver,
> > > > convert its users to use software nodes.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This looks good to me, thanks for cleaning this up! I think Geert has this
> > > hardware, adding him to Cc in case he wants to give it a spin.
> >
> > The SPI controller is only present on TX4938, not on TX4927, so it is
> > unused on my rbtx4927 board.
> >
> > > > arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/spi.h | 4 ++--
> > > > arch/mips/txx9/generic/spi_eeprom.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++------------
> > > > arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4938/setup.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > Probably all of this can be removed, given the SPI controller driver
> > itself was removed in commit 74523a5dae0c96d6 ("spi: txx9: Remove
> > driver")?
>
> are you ok with completly removing rbtx4938 support ? Can I rbtx4939
> board support, too ?
Fine for me, I only have rbtx4927.
BTW, I'm using it in 32-bit mode, as the VxWorks bootloader cannot boot
64-bit images. Are there other boards with such a limitation? Perhaps
there's even shim support for booting 64-bit kernels on such boards,
so I can test both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
