On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:15:32PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:12:32AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > Thomas, > > Any comment on the series? The changes aren't that comprehensive, so it would > > be great to merge it in before the 5.10 merge window is opened. > > for the both patches there is no user for it, so I don't see a reason > to apply it. @Thomas. I see your point. I'll merge them into my repo with Baikal-T1 CSP/BSP patches and will deliver all at once when the kernel is ready to accept the changes (most likely in 3 - 5 months). @Jiaxun, if you've any hardware which for sure supports the strong UC ordering, feel free to submit a patchset which activates the proposed here config together with my STRONG_UC_ORDERING-alteration applied before your changes. -Sergey > > Thomas. > > -- > Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a > good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
