On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is not how it works. Patches are posted at the ML and developers can > review and comment about them. Does those patches break something? If not, > please stop flaming. I'm confused why you think this email was a flame. It's asked three very straight-forward questions that could have easily have been asked of any submitter who failed to cc: the maintainer for a particular driver in the patch submission. > With regards to Cc the driver maintainer (mkrufky), the patch also got > forwarded to him, in priv (it were supposed to be sent via git send-email, > but, as it wasn't, the patch was manually forwarded for him to review, > just after the patchbomb). Stating that a clerical error had been made during the git send-email and thus you forwarded it to him in private would have been a perfectly reasonable answer to my question. No need to create drama where there isn't any. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
