Hi Scott, On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:59:45PM +0800, Scott Jiang wrote: > >> If I disable this interrupt, other errors like fifo underflow are ignored. > >> Perhaps I can add a parameter in platform data to let user decide to > >> register this interrupt or not. > > > > I think a more generic solution would be preferrable. If that causes > > ignoring real errors, that's of course bad. I wonder if there would be a > > way around that. > > > > Is there a publicly available datasheet for the bridge that I could take a > > look at? > > > Yes, http://www.analog.com/en/processors-dsp/blackfin/adsp-bf548/processors/technical-documentation/index.html. > There is a hardware reference manual for bf54x, bridge is eppi. Yeah, indeed it's the first time I see hardware like this. So to support this properly, we truly need the new sensor control interface and an ability to make those blanking values unchangeable. -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
