Hi Guennadi, Morimoto-san, > > > Both are needed. > > > These are bug fix patches > > > > I tried to capture several frames beginning with the very first one (as > > much as performance allowed), and I do see several black or wrongly > > coloured framed in the beginning, but none of those patches, including the > > proposed 300ms at the end of .s_stream() fixes the problem reliably. So, > > either this problems, that these patches fix, are specific to the Solution > > Engine board (is it the one, where the problems have been observed?), or > > one needs a different testing method. If they are SE-specific - I don't > > think, getting those fixes in the driver is very important, because > > mt9t112 data for SE is not in the mainline. If I was testing wrongly, > > please, tell me how exactly to reproduce those problems and see, how one > > or another patch fixes them. > > I guess mt9t112 camera is used in SE (with local circuit ?) > and Ecovec. > But I forgot detail of this issue (I have no mt9t112 for now). > > I think Phil is the person who wanted this patch. There are capture issues on the Ecovec board with this camera. iirc, these patches made the situation better but still didn't completely fix all issues. Morimoto-san has made comments previously that the mt9t112 is a little difficult to setup and we don't have the relevant information from the manufacturer. Thanks Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
