Morimoto-san Thanks for your reply. On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Hi Guennadi, all > > > > > mt9t112 camera needs 100 milliseconds for initializing > > > > Special thanks to Phil > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reported-by: Phil Edworthy <Phil.Edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c b/drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c > > > > index 7438f8d..e581d8a 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c > > > > @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int mt9t112_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable) > > > > /* Invert PCLK (Data sampled on falling edge of pixclk) */ > > > > mt9t112_reg_write(ret, client, 0x3C20, param); > > > > > > > > - mdelay(5); > > > > + mdelay(100); > > > > > > > > priv->flags |= INIT_DONE; > > > > } > > > > > > Hi Guennadi, > > > > > > What's the status of this patch? > > > > > > It applies ok for me, and I couldn't find any reference at the > > > ML why it was not applied yet. > > > > Hm, yeah... Looks like also this patch: > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: The flag which control camera-init is removed > > > > > > mt9t112 should always be initialized when camera start. > > > Because current driver doesn't run this operation, > > > it will be un-stable if user side player run open/close several times. > > > Special thanks to Namiki-san > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reported-by: Takashi Namiki <Takashi.Namiki@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > has not been applied nor discussed on the list... For patches that old I > > would tend to say: if the author / submitter didn't re-submit, then, > > probably, patches aren't relevant anymore... Although it is quite > > possible, that I failed to process them back then. Morimoto-san, do you > > have any information on these patches? Have these problems been solved > > somehow, so that the patches have become obsolete, or are the problems, > > that they address, still there? > > This patch is needed for mt9t112 camera initialize. > I thought that it was already applied. Which patch do you mean? Patch 2/3, or 3/3, or both are needed? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
