Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify delay time after initialize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guennadi, and Phil

Thank you for your check/test

> > Both are needed.
> > These are bug fix patches
> 
> I tried to capture several frames beginning with the very first one (as 
> much as performance allowed), and I do see several black or wrongly 
> coloured framed in the beginning, but none of those patches, including the 
> proposed 300ms at the end of .s_stream() fixes the problem reliably. So, 
> either this problems, that these patches fix, are specific to the Solution 
> Engine board (is it the one, where the problems have been observed?), or 
> one needs a different testing method. If they are SE-specific - I don't 
> think, getting those fixes in the driver is very important, because 
> mt9t112 data for SE is not in the mainline. If I was testing wrongly, 
> please, tell me how exactly to reproduce those problems and see, how one 
> or another patch fixes them.

I guess mt9t112 camera is used in SE (with local circuit ?)
and Ecovec.
But I forgot detail of this issue (I have no mt9t112 for now).

I think Phil is the person who wanted this patch.

But if this issue happen only SE, I can agree to Guennadi

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux