Em 13-10-2011 20:19, Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin Larsson <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/13/2011 07:48 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> You were close: em2884, drx-k, xc5000, and for analog it uses the >>>>> afv4910b. >>>> Then it should be peace of cake at least for digital side. >>> I don't think we've ever done xc5000 on an em28xx before, so it's >>> entirely possible that the xc5000 clock stretching will expose bugs in >>> the em28xx i2c implementation (it uncovered bugs in essentially every >>> other bridge driver I did work on). >>> >>> That, and we don't know how much is hard-coded into the drx-k driver >>> making it specific to the couple of device it's currently being used >>> with. >>> >>> But yeah, it shouldn't be rocket science. I added support for the >>> board in my OSX driver and it only took me a couple of hours. >>> >>> Devin >>> >> >> Eddi De Pieri has patches for the HVR-930C that works somewhat. The >> hardware in that stick is the same. >> >> MvH >> Benjamin Larsson > > While the basic chips used are different, they are completely > different hardware designs and likely have different GPIO > configurations as well as IF specs. The IF settings for xc5000 with DRX-K are solved with this patch: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7932/ Basically, DRX-K will use whatever IF the tuner uses. I've sent to Eddi to get some feedback, but he never returned back. > > Devin > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
