Em 31-03-2011 14:15, handygewinnspiel@xxxxxx escreveu:
>
>> Em 29-03-2011 20:21, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>>> Em 29-03-2011 17:11, handygewinnspiel@xxxxxx escreveu:
>>>> So I changed it now to scan any srate for 6MHz networks, but skip over
>> those which are unsupported by bandwidth limitation.
>> ...
>>> Anyway, I'll test the today's version and reply if I detect any troubles
>> on it.
>>
>> Test results:
>>
>> $ ./w_scan -c BR -fc
>> Took about 30 mins for scan. As the board I'm using doesn't support
>> QAM_AUTO
>> for DVB-C, it seek only QAM_64
>
> This is unexpected && should be fixed to fit to w_scan's default behaviour: first QAM_64, then QAM_256.
>
> Can you pls re-check with the following change in countries.c line 500ff
>
> /*
> * start/stop values for dvbc qam loop
> * 0 == QAM_64, 1 == QAM_256, 2 == QAM_128
> */
> int dvbc_qam_max(int channel, int channellist) {
> switch(channellist) {
> case DVBC_FI: return 2; //QAM128
> + case DVBC_BR:
> case DVBC_FR:
> case DVBC_QAM: return 1; //QAM256
> default: return 0; //no qam loop
> }
> }
>
>
> int dvbc_qam_min(int channel, int channellist) {
> switch(channellist) {
> case DVBC_FI:
> + case DVBC_BR:
> case DVBC_FR:
> case DVBC_QAM: return 0; //QAM64
> default: return 0; //no qam loop
> }
> }
>
> I don't think that adding QAM_128 makes sense.
Agreed
> Later, if i have more reports from 6MHz network users, i will reduce the number of symbol rates.
Ok.
Worked. Thanks!
Mauro.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
