Em 09-12-2010 10:08, Jean-Francois Moine escreveu: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:06:06 -0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Drivers should provide a wmaxpacketsize range which they need / can >>> deal with for a given resolution. This way we can fix your does not >>> need highest alt setting at lower resolutions scenario (which is a >>> very valid one), while still allowing fallback to a lower alt >>> setting if the driver can deal with lower settings too, be it by >>> lowering framerate or by increasing compression (decreasing the >>> image quality). >> >> It seems a good strategy. > > Hi, > > That seems fine also to me. > > Mauro, about your patch, there is no need to add the variable > 'no_audio_hack': just resetting the flag 'audio' in the subdrivers > should be enough. > > Also, as a quicker hack, the 'audio' flag could be set only when USB is > 1.1. Could that fix the problems found with sn9c20x and stv06xx? It probably will fix for sn9c20x and stv06xx, but, as Hans pointed, the patch logic is broken. I prefer to just revert the patch and apply another one with the right fix. Could you please cook such patch? Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
