On 20/07/2023 11:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> struct i2c_driver::probe_new is about to go away. Switch the driver to
>> use the probe callback with the same prototype.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
>> index de5bc19e715b..2b9e1b3a3bf4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
>> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver ov01a10_i2c_driver = {
>> .pm = &ov01a10_pm_ops,
>> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ov01a10_acpi_ids),
>> },
>> - .probe_new = ov01a10_probe,
>> + .probe = ov01a10_probe,
>> .remove = ov01a10_remove,
>> };
>
> I plan to ask Wolfram to merge a patch into i2c-next dropping .probe_new
> for v6.7-rc1. I want to get this early into next after v6.6-rc1, so it
> would be great to get this patch in before v6.6-rc1.
>
> If this won't happen, the backup plan is to send this patch together
> with the change of i2c_driver for Wolfram to merge via the i2c tree.
>
> Is this patch still (or at all) on someone's radar for merging?
I merged this yesterday in our staging tree for 6.6. Did you get an email
from patchwork?
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20230626090533.556406-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I also merged yesterday your patch converting three more drivers:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20230718204541.3955386-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Regards,
Hans
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
