Hello,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> struct i2c_driver::probe_new is about to go away. Switch the driver to
> use the probe callback with the same prototype.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
> index de5bc19e715b..2b9e1b3a3bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov01a10.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver ov01a10_i2c_driver = {
> .pm = &ov01a10_pm_ops,
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ov01a10_acpi_ids),
> },
> - .probe_new = ov01a10_probe,
> + .probe = ov01a10_probe,
> .remove = ov01a10_remove,
> };
I plan to ask Wolfram to merge a patch into i2c-next dropping .probe_new
for v6.7-rc1. I want to get this early into next after v6.6-rc1, so it
would be great to get this patch in before v6.6-rc1.
If this won't happen, the backup plan is to send this patch together
with the change of i2c_driver for Wolfram to merge via the i2c tree.
Is this patch still (or at all) on someone's radar for merging?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
