On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > > > "completely raw" format. > > > > > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it exists and > > > we have to plan for it. > > > > OK. So we can have RDS_RAW_READWRITE and also RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE > > (or something to the same effect)? > > In theory, yes. My proposed API additions allow for this to be added in the > future. Frankly, I don't think it is likely that it will be needed, but you > never know. Yes but I would like to add the RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE possibility right away because that's what the wl1273 driver does now... I guess that's OK? B.R. Matti > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > B.R. > > Matti > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
