On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > "completely raw" format. > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it exists and > we have to plan for it. OK. So we can have RDS_RAW_READWRITE and also RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE (or something to the same effect)? B.R. Matti -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
