On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > > "completely raw" format. > > > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it exists and > > we have to plan for it. > > OK. So we can have RDS_RAW_READWRITE and also RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE > (or something to the same effect)? In theory, yes. My proposed API additions allow for this to be added in the future. Frankly, I don't think it is likely that it will be needed, but you never know. Regards, Hans > > B.R. > Matti > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
