> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 3:20 PM > To: Guennadi Liakhovetski > Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit > > > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > > >> > 14) V4L2 video output vs. framebuffer. Guennadi Liakhovetski. > >> > > >> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Guennadi, > >> > >> Do you have anything in your mind on this? Are you preparing any slides > >> for this? Do you want me to have something from OMAP side which we can > >> use as a use-case? > > > > Yes, I will prepare some introduction, maybe a couple of slides. My > > impression is, that we shall be making all topics as short as possible, > > so, I'll try to make it concise, but I don't know exactly yet how much > > time we'd get. > > Concise would be good: the first day will be packed, so I prefer to have > short presentations, and a Q&A session afterwards in case there are things > that need clarification. But I think that on Tuesday we can talk a lot > more about this. I think this is a very relevant issue for embedded > systems. > > >> I can make couple of slides on this. > > > > In principle - yes, sure, I'd love you to present your use-case, but as I > > said - no idea whether we'll have time for this. So, definitely, would be > > great if you could comment on the topic, if we get time, slides would be > > great too, so, if it's not too complicated for you - please prepare them, > > but unfortunately I do not know yet whether we'll get a chance to go > > through them. In fact, I'm not quite sure how topics without an explicitly > > mentioned presentation should work - there would be some introduction in > > any case, right, Hans? Just not as long as a "proper presentation?" And > > the mentioned 10 minutes are only for the presentation, the discussion > > comes on top of that? So, I think, we should have time for your slides, > > Vaibhav, Hans can correct me if I'm wrong;) > > For simple topics a presentation is overkill and you can just say what the > status and/or plan is. For more complex issues a presentation helps to > understand the problems quicker. And yes, the discussion comes on top of > the presentation. > > The reason I want to keep the presentations short on Monday is that we > have some 15 topics or so to go through in, say, 7 hours. And of those 7 > hours one to two hours are reserved for anything to do with memory > handling. That does not leave a lot of time for the other 14 topics. > > Now, remember that on Tuesday and to a lesser extent on Wednesday we will > have more time to discuss some of these topics in more depth. And this > topic is one that deserves to be discussed more extensively. It would be > interesting to hear the views of several of the companies that have to > work with the framebuffer API: what are their experiences, ideas on how to > improve it, building a fb driver on top of a v4l driver, etc. > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] I completely aligned with this, I will prepare the slides and if we have time and need for this we can talk about it. Also I will have to prepare couple of slide presenting current status of OMAP drivers (for me it is Display Driver), should be re-used here. Thanks, Vaibhav > Regards, > > Hans > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
