> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-media-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-media- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 1:46 PM > To: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit > > Hi all, > > This is the second version of a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini- > summit > on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > If you want to attend the summit then contact Sakari Ailus > (sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). We are very full already (over 20 > attendees), so I'm not sure if there is still room left. > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through all > topics and either come to a conclusion quickly for the 'simple' topics, or > discuss enough so that everyone understands the problem for the more complex > issues. > > The second day will be used for in-depth discussions on those complex topics > and on the third day we will go through all topics again and translate the > discussions into something concrete like a time-line, action items, etc. > > We have a lot to discuss, so we almost certainly have to split the second > day > into two tracks, each discussing different topics. If we do split up, then > one > track will touch on the videobuf-related topics and the other on the > remaining > topics. > > The first day will also feature a few short presentations on various topics. > Presentations shouldn't be longer than, say, 10 minutes tops. Please keep > them > as short and to the point as possible. These presentations are meant to get > everyone up to speed quickly. Most of us have an extensive background in > video > hardware and the v4l subsystem, so you don't need to spend time explaining > things. > > After each topic I've put the names of the main developers active in that > area. > If you see your name, then make sure you know the status of that topic so > you > can explain it to everyone else. If I think it warrants a presentation, then > I > will mention that. Of course, if you disagree, or want/don't want to do a > presentation then just say so. It's a tentative agenda only. > > The topics below are in no particular order except for the first one. I am > very pleased that Qualcomm has joined this project so I think it would be > nice to start the meeting off with a presentation on their HW architecture. > > 1) Presentation on the Qualcomm video hw architecture. Most of us have no > experience with Qualcomm hardware, so I've asked Jeff Zhong to give a > short > overview of their video hardware. > > 2) Removal of V4L1: status of driver conversion in the kernel, status of > moving v4l1->v4l2 conversion into libv4l1. What needs to be done, when > will it be done and who will do it. Driver conversion: Hans Verkuil, > libv4l1 conversion: Hans de Goede. > > 3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > for > a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or > do > we need a videobuf2. If the latter, what would be needed to convert > existing > drivers over to a videobuf2. Related topics (custom/pluggable allocators, > out-of-order buffer dequeuing and per-buffer wait queues) will also be > part > of this topic. > Laurent Pinchart and Pawel Osciak with presentations. > > 4) Multi-planar support. Pawel Osciak. > > 5) Media Controller Roadmap. Laurent Pinchart has a presentation. > > 6) TO DO list regarding V4L2 core framework including the new control > framework. > Hans Verkuil. Will be a presentation. > > 7) Status of the Texas Instruments drivers: omapX (Laurent Pinchart/Hiremath > Vaibhav) > and DMxxxx (Sergio Aguirre). Probably should be a short presentation. > > 8) soc-camera status. Particularly with regards to the remaining soc-camera > dependencies in sensor drivers. Guennadi Liakhovetski. > > 9) Driver compliance. We need a framework for V4L2 driver compliance. Hans > Verkuil. > > 10) Discuss list of 'reference' programs to test against. Mauro Carvalho > Chehab. > > 11) Adopting old V4L1 programs and converting to V4L2. Hans de Goede? > > 12) Status of intel drivers. Xiaolin Zhang. > > 13) Remote Controllers. Presentation by Mauro Carvalho Chehab. > > 14) V4L2 video output vs. framebuffer. Guennadi Liakhovetski. > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Guennadi, Do you have anything in your mind on this? Are you preparing any slides for this? Do you want me to have something from OMAP side which we can use as a use-case? I can make couple of slides on this. Thanks, Vaibhav > 15) A processing plugin API for libv4l. Hans de Goede. > See: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux- > media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg18993.html > > It is my understanding that we will also have X11 and gstreamer experts on > hand. > Topics relating to that are welcome. > > During the memory handling brainstorming session earlier this year we also > touched on creating some sort of a generic buffer model allowing for easy > exchange between v4l buffers, framebuffers, texture buffers, etc. It is my > opinion that we should not discuss this in Helsinki. The list of topics is > already quite long and I think it is too early to start working on that. We > probably need another brainstorming session first in order to come up with > a reasonable proposal. > > Comments? Topics I missed? > > Regards, > > Hans > > -- > Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
