Hi Kieran,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 15/06/2020 00:59, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The external pixel rate is retrieved when starting the camerarx and only
> > used then. There's no need to store it in the cal_camerarx structure, it
> > can be returned by cal_camerarx_get_external_info() and explicitly
> > passed to cal_camerarx_config().
> >
> > While at it, rename cal_camerarx_get_external_info() to
> > cal_camerarx_get_external_rate() to better reflect the function's
> > purpose.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
> > index 8326db0e4197..a11457909134 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
> > @@ -272,7 +272,6 @@ struct cal_camerarx {
> > struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint endpoint;
> > struct device_node *sensor_node;
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sensor;
> > - unsigned int external_rate;
>
> Here, external_rate is 32 bit,
>
> > };
> >
> > struct cal_dev {
> > @@ -481,9 +480,10 @@ static void cal_quickdump_regs(struct cal_dev *cal)
> > * ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > */
> >
> > -static int cal_camerarx_get_external_info(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > +static s64 cal_camerarx_get_external_rate(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > {
> > struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> > + s64 rate;
>
> and now it becomes a 64 bit value.
>
> >
> > if (!phy->sensor)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -495,10 +495,10 @@ static int cal_camerarx_get_external_info(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > return -EPIPE;
> > }
> >
> > - phy->external_rate = v4l2_ctrl_g_ctrl_int64(ctrl);
> > - phy_dbg(3, phy, "sensor Pixel Rate: %u\n", phy->external_rate);
> > + rate = v4l2_ctrl_g_ctrl_int64(ctrl);
> > + phy_dbg(3, phy, "sensor Pixel Rate: %llu\n", rate);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return rate;
> > }
> >
> > static void cal_camerarx_lane_config(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static void cal_camerarx_disable(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > #define TCLK_MISS 1
> > #define TCLK_SETTLE 14
> >
> > -static void cal_camerarx_config(struct cal_camerarx *phy,
> > +static void cal_camerarx_config(struct cal_camerarx *phy, s64 external_rate,
> > const struct cal_fmt *fmt)
> > {
> > unsigned int reg0, reg1;
> > @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ static void cal_camerarx_config(struct cal_camerarx *phy,
> >
> > /* DPHY timing configuration */
> > /* CSI-2 is DDR and we only count used lanes. */
> > - csi2_ddrclk_khz = phy->external_rate / 1000
> > + csi2_ddrclk_khz = external_rate / 1000
> > / (2 * num_lanes) * fmt->bpp;
>
> Which causes this calculation to fail on 32 bit ARM builds.
> (I'm building for the DRA76-EVM).
Oops :-/
> I've got the following fix up on the top of your tree to solve this, but
> I'm not particularly happy about having to break the calculation up (and
> re-use external_rate) though the use of do_div.
>
> From ca6ce335a852e34364bc45cb4240f703e4ea4248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:19:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] media: ti-vpe: cal: Use do_div() for 64 bit operations
>
> Support building the CAL driver on arm32 bit targets by updating the
> CSI2 clock calculation (which uses a signed 64 bit input value from
> the sensors pixel clock rate) to use the do_div() helpers.
>
> The calculation is split into distinct parts to maintain
> order of operations while making use of the do_div macro and further
> re-ordered to convert to kHz at the end to maintain precision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
> index 014ca46509db..0ef19a516902 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal-camerarx.c
> @@ -126,9 +126,25 @@ static void cal_camerarx_config(struct cal_camerarx
> *phy, s64 external_rate)
> u32 num_lanes = mipi_csi2->num_data_lanes;
>
> /* DPHY timing configuration */
> - /* CSI-2 is DDR and we only count used lanes. */
> - csi2_ddrclk_khz = external_rate / 1000
> - / (2 * num_lanes) * phy->fmtinfo->bpp;
> +
> + /*
> + * CSI-2 is DDR and we only count used lanes.
> + *
> + * csi2_ddrclk_khz = external_rate / 1000
> + * / (2 * num_lanes) * phy->fmtinfo->bpp;
> + *
> + * The equation is broken into separate statements to maintain
> + * order of operations, and conversion to kHz is done last to
> + * keep precision.
> + *
> + * The 64 bit external_rate is modified during this equation and
> + * contains the result, not the original after calculation.
> + */
> + do_div(external_rate, 2 * num_lanes);
> + external_rate *= phy->fmtinfo->bpp;
> + do_div(external_rate, 1000);
> + csi2_ddrclk_khz = external_rate;
How about
external_rate *= phy->fmtinfo->bpp;
do_div(external_rate, 2 * num_lanes * 1000);
> +
> phy_dbg(1, phy, "csi2_ddrclk_khz: %d\n", csi2_ddrclk_khz);
>
> /* THS_TERM: Programmed value = floor(20 ns/DDRClk period) */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> If you have a better way to correctly calculate the rate (also noting
> that I moved the /1000 to the end, I'm not sure if that's more correct,
> or makes it stop following what the hardware would do) - please update
> accordingly, or feel free to squash this patch in as you wish.
>
>
> With the calculation corrected:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --
> Kieran
>
>
> > phy_dbg(1, phy, "csi2_ddrclk_khz: %d\n", csi2_ddrclk_khz);
> >
> > @@ -667,13 +667,14 @@ static void cal_camerarx_wait_stop_state(struct cal_camerarx *phy)
> > static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy,
> > const struct cal_fmt *fmt)
> > {
> > + s64 external_rate;
> > u32 sscounter;
> > u32 val;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = cal_camerarx_get_external_info(phy);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + external_rate = cal_camerarx_get_external_rate(phy);
> > + if (external_rate < 0)
> > + return external_rate;
> >
> > ret = v4l2_subdev_call(phy->sensor, core, s_power, 1);
> > if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > @@ -719,7 +720,7 @@ static int cal_camerarx_start(struct cal_camerarx *phy,
> > reg_read(phy, CAL_CSI2_PHY_REG0);
> >
> > /* Program the PHY timing parameters. */
> > - cal_camerarx_config(phy, fmt);
> > + cal_camerarx_config(phy, external_rate, fmt);
> >
> > /*
> > * b. Assert the FORCERXMODE signal.
> > @@ -1034,7 +1035,6 @@ static struct cal_camerarx *cal_camerarx_create(struct cal_dev *cal,
> >
> > phy->cal = cal;
> > phy->instance = instance;
> > - phy->external_rate = 192000000;
> >
> > phy->res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > (instance == 0) ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
