On Tue, 12 May 2020 19:01:22 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:56 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Tue, 12 May 2020 14:21:49 +0300 > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:12 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:21 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > > > <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Em Sat, 2 May 2020 20:33:14 +0300 > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 8:04 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Em Sat, 2 May 2020 19:08:36 +0300 > > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Btw, https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/commit/?h=atomisp_v2.1&id=65608aa8d34ea274600ab2cf6f0cf54ee86d8fd1 > > > > is incorrect approach. Look closer what PCI does in case when > > > > pcim_enable_device() has been called. > > > > > > This has resource leaks > > > https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/commit/?h=atomisp_v2.1&id=88b03de5d705f5f46a896dbd21ef9472030bb8d3 > > > > > > Easier just to acpi_handle_info(ACPI_HANDLE(...), ...); > > > > > > We don't enumerate them w/o ACPI IIRC. > > > > Well, at least while in staging, it would be good to know more details > > about the probing issues on different hardware that people might be > > testing it. > > > > avoiding to use a get_device() here is not possible, because the > > prints will use the adev to return some info we may need: > > > > ov2680 i2c-OVTI2680:00: ov2680_probe: ACPI detected it on bus ID=CAM1, HID=OVTI2680 > > Why do you need get_device()? Are you expecting device may have gone? > acpi_handle_*() / dev_*() are not enough? > > > This, together with the DMI product ID on this message: > > > > atomisp-isp2 0000:00:03.0: Detected Cherrytrail version 54 (ISP2401) on T101HA > > > > may help to avoid users to run acpixtract/iasl/dmidecode when adding > > new entries to the dmi match tables. Not 100%, since BIOSes may > > still use different names for the sensor data. > > > Trying to open a video devnode returns error and produce those logs: > > > > [ 3262.961623] atomisp-isp2 0000:00:03.0: open device ATOMISP ISP CAPTURE output > > [ 3262.971350] sh_css_hrt_system_is_idle() 44: warning: SP not idle > > [ 3262.971364] sh_css_hrt_system_is_idle() 49: warning: ISP not idle > > [ 3262.971712] sh_css_hrt_system_is_idle() 56: warning: FIFO channel 12 is not empty > > [ 3262.972079] sh_css_hrt_system_is_idle() 56: warning: FIFO channel 26 is not empty > > [ 3262.972188] atomisp-isp2 0000:00:03.0: css init failed --- bad firmware? > > [ 3262.974982] atomisp-isp2 0000:00:03.0: atomisp_mrfld_pre_power_down: error in iunit interrupt. status reg=0xffffffff > > In my case when I tried with 2015-04 / 2015-05 firmware for ISP2400 I > got to no crashes, but no IRQs, presumably due to absence of PMIC > integration. > Do you have the 2015-04 / 2015-05 firmware still available? I would like to try them as well. -- with kind regards, Patrik
