On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote: > > On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >lib/ > > > > libv4l1/ > > > > libv4l2/ > > > > libv4lconvert/ > > > >utils/ > > > > v4l2-dbg > > > > v4l2-ctl > > > > cx18-ctl > > > > ivtv-ctl > > > >contrib/ > > > > test/ > > > > everything else > > > > > > > > git clone git://ifup.org/philips/create-v4l-utils.git > > cd create-v4l-utils/ > > ./convert.sh > > > > You should now have v4l-utils.git which should have this directory > > struture. If we need to move other things around let me know and I can > > tweak name-filter.sh > > > > Thoughts? Let me know how we should proceed with dropping v4l2-apps > > from v4l-dvb. > > > > Re: code style cleanup. I think we should do that once we drop > > v4l2-apps/ from v4l-dvb and make the new v4l-utils.git upstream. > > Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was > merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports > v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we > should also merge the tools to a media-utils repository. > > It remains a fact of life that dvb and v4l are connected and trying to > artificially keep them apart does not make much sense to me. Easy to do but who should be the maintainer of the dvb things? According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and clutter up the git tree with dead code? Cheers, Brandon [1] http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxTV_dvb-apps -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
