On Thursday 26 March 2009 19:45:53 Udo A. Steinberg wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:45:18 -0400 Steven Toth (ST) wrote: > > ST> I too tend to have multiple remotes, I don't think it's that unusual > for ST> long standing Hauppauge customers to have many boards with many > types of ST> remotes. > ST> > ST> > It might be better to have an option to explicitly allow old > Hauppauge ST> > remotes that send 0x00. > ST> > > ST> I could live with this. It relegates older remotes but those remotes > ST> are no longer made. This feels like a good compromise. > > How about changing the parameter such that it is a filter mask? The > default value of 0x0 would accept all remotes. For non-zero values, each > bit set in the parameter would filter the device address corresponding to > that bit, e.g. 0x1 would filter address 0x0, 0x80000000 would filter > address 0x1f, etc. Seems way to complicated to me. Remember that end users have no idea about the device addresses, so it should be a simple to understand module option. So I'd just go with Steve's preference. Regards, Hans > > Cheers, > > - Udo -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
