Hello Alejandro,
Am Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 03:47:27PM +0100 schrieb Alejandro Colomar:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 10:46:25AM GMT, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Without further ado, the following was found:
> >
> > Issue: (it) is \\[aq]/\\[aq]s correct (the final s is a english plural s)
>
> Would you mind clarifying the report? I don't understand it. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> >
> > "Note that UTF-8 is self-synchronizing: 10xxxxxx is a tail, any other byte is "
> > "the head of a code. Note that the only way ASCII bytes occur in a UTF-8 "
> > "stream, is as themselves. In particular, there are no embedded NULs "
> > "(\\[aq]\\[rs]0\\[aq]) or \\[aq]/\\[aq]s that form part of some larger code."
As I understand it, the reporter is wondering if the "s" after \\[aq]/\\[aq]
is correct. For the (\\[aq]\\[rs]0\\[aq]) there is no (plural) "s" and
here grammar (which probably dictates a plural s) and clarity are a
little in conflict.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
