Re: POSIX manual pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

[I reordered your answer for my response.]

On 2023-09-05 14:34, Andrew Josey wrote:
> 
> hi Alejandro
> 
> Apologies for the delay.

NP

> 
> Are you in touch with Michael Kerrisk?

Nope.

> It also appeared in discussions with Michael in 2020, that he had a way to convert the source format to man page format.

Yep, this is probably "the way":

<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages-posix.git/tree/posix.py>

> In the past we have worked with him and made a permissions grant - which outlines the terms we are able to grant — these are limited
> by the copyright holders. 

I understand.  Would it be possible to suggest the copyright holders opening a
little bit more?  The C++ standard seems to be more open (it has a public git
repository with the source of the drafts) [1].  Maybe POSIX could do something
similar?    It would make contributions to the man-pages-posix project easier,
as contributors would be able to test the script with the original sources;
instead of just blindly trying something, and asking the maintainer to try it
with the secret sources.

[1]:  <https://github.com/cplusplus/draft>


Cheers,

Alex

-- 
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux