Hello Alejandro,
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 10:14:29PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On 12/4/22 14:57, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Alejandro,
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:47:52PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > On 12/4/22 10:07, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > Without further ado, the following was found:
> > > >
> > > > Issue: pinned → anchored?
> > > >
> > > > "Process credentials themselves reference keyrings with specific semantics."
> > > > "These keyrings are pinned as long as the set of credentials exists, which is"
> > > > "usually as long as the process exists."
> > >
> > > I'm not sure. I see uses of both terms, and don't know the interfaces
> > > enough to be able to tell which term is more appropriate here. Please CC
> > > any developers of those interfaces and see what they think about it.
> >
> > Well, you have a subtitle called:
> >
> > Anchoring keys
> >
> > (Just a few lines above this paragraph). Thus I wondered if this is a
> > different concept than pinning.
> >
> > I mark it WONTFIX for now in our sources, so it does not get reported
> > again.
>
> No, please, report it again. It's just that I don't know at the moment.
> I'd like to confirm this report.
No problem, I switched it back.
So if it remains unchanged in 6.02 it might get reported again.
Thanks for handling this!
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
