Hi Helge, On 12/4/22 14:57, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello Alejandro, On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:47:52PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:On 12/4/22 10:07, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:Without further ado, the following was found: Issue: pinned → anchored? "Process credentials themselves reference keyrings with specific semantics." "These keyrings are pinned as long as the set of credentials exists, which is" "usually as long as the process exists."I'm not sure. I see uses of both terms, and don't know the interfaces enough to be able to tell which term is more appropriate here. Please CC any developers of those interfaces and see what they think about it.Well, you have a subtitle called: Anchoring keys (Just a few lines above this paragraph). Thus I wondered if this is a different concept than pinning. I mark it WONTFIX for now in our sources, so it does not get reported again.
No, please, report it again. It's just that I don't know at the moment. I'd like to confirm this report.
Cheers, Alex
Thanks!
Greetings
Helge
-- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
