Hi Alex, On 12/31/20 12:20 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: > > > On 12/30/20 11:43 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 12/30/20 10:41 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >>> Glibc uses 'off64_t' instead of 'loff_t'. >> >> Okay. >> >>> This patch doesn't change the types in the code example, >>> because it uses the Linux syscall, and not the glibc wrapper. >> >> I think the example probably also needs fixing then. There's >> no longer a need for syscall(2) in this example, I think. > > Hi Michael, > > I thought the same, but glibc 2.26 is still supported, > and lacks the wrapper. > Would you change it already? Yes. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
