On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:14:55PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:27:40PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Reber <areber@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm generally fine with all of this, so: > > Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > but should this maybe also mention that a pid namespace either already > needs to have a pid 1 or if it does not the chosen pid has to be set to > 1. In short: > "Callers may only choose a pid > 1 in a given pid namespace if an init > process (i.e. a process with pid 1) already exists. Otherwise the pid > entry for this pid namespace must be 1." > or something like this. I like that. I will add this to v3. Adrian
