On Tuesday 01 May 2012 14:21:36 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 May 2012 01:38:35 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > --- a/man2/fork.2 > >> > +++ b/man2/fork.2 > >> > @@ -184,6 +184,10 @@ capability. > >> > .B ENOMEM > >> > .BR fork () > >> > failed to allocate the necessary kernel structures because memory is > >> > tight. +.TP > >> > +.B ENOSYS > >> > +.BR fork () > >> > +is not supported on this platform (e.g. a no-mmu setup). > >> > .SH "CONFORMING TO" > >> > SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001. > >> > .SH NOTES > >> > >> I'm curious. Which architectures currently do this, do you know? > > > > ones w/out an mmu ;) > > > > looking at 'config MMU', arch/*/Kconfig, i see it could happen to: > > arm blackfin c6x frv h8300 microblaze mips xtensa > > Thanks Mike. Patch applied. (But I couldn't see how one deduces that > mips is on that list.) ah, i guess no-mmu mips hasn't been merged yet. i thought it had (much like arm no-mmu finally was). -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
