Re: [PATCH] fork(2): add ENOSYS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 01 May 2012 01:38:35 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > --- a/man2/fork.2
> > +++ b/man2/fork.2
> > @@ -184,6 +184,10 @@ capability.
> >  .B ENOMEM
> >  .BR fork ()
> >  failed to allocate the necessary kernel structures because memory is
> > tight. +.TP
> > +.B ENOSYS
> > +.BR fork ()
> > +is not supported on this platform (e.g. a no-mmu setup).
> >  .SH "CONFORMING TO"
> >  SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001.
> >  .SH NOTES
> 
> I'm curious. Which architectures currently do this, do you know?

ones w/out an mmu ;)

looking at 'config MMU', arch/*/Kconfig, i see it could happen to:
	arm blackfin c6x frv h8300 microblaze mips xtensa
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux