Re: [PATCHES] Typos and questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The patches starting with a 9 need to be reviewed. Some of them are not
> patches, but questions:
>  * 904-tcp.7-list_separator.patch
>  * 919_cpuset.7-question.patch

Hi Nicolas,

It was great how you split out the 0* and 9* series. Thanks. In fact,
you could have been even more confident with some of the 9* patches,
since they were (to my eye) unquestionably correct :-).

I have so far processed the following:

905 applied
906 applied
908 applied
909 rejected (this preposition is okay)
910 applied
911 edited: in fact what was missing was "to" berfor "POSIX.1-2001".
912 applied
914 applied

I will get to the rest later.

Thanks.

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Watch my Linux system programming book progress to publication!
http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux