Re: [PATCHES] Typos and questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 09:56:34AM +0200, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The patches starting with a 9 need to be reviewed. Some of them are not
> > patches, but questions:
> >  * 904-tcp.7-list_separator.patch
> >  * 919_cpuset.7-question.patch
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> It was great how you split out the 0* and 9* series. Thanks. In fact,
> you could have been even more confident with some of the 9* patches,
> since they were (to my eye) unquestionably correct :-).
> 
> I have so far processed the following:
> 
> 905 applied
> 906 applied
> 908 applied
> 909 rejected (this preposition is okay)
> 910 applied
> 911 edited: in fact what was missing was "to" berfor "POSIX.1-2001".
> 912 applied
> 914 applied

Thanks for the reviews and good luck with your book.

-- 
Nekral
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux