Karel Zak wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 02:41:51PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Karel Zak wrote: >>>> 1. Agree that this is the way to do it. >>>> 2. Add the options to section 4. >>>> 3. Clean up mount(8). >>> 4. found a way how maintain and keep the man pages up to date. >>> >> As far as 4. is concerned -- I personally think that keeping man pages >> that directly describe kernel interfaces (e.g. section 2, and parts of >> 4, 5, and 7) in the kernel git tree is the most logical option. > > That's exactly my opinion ... somewhere in Documentation/ and > maintained *together* with fs-depend code. > By the way, lest someone gets the wrong idea... I think mtk has done a fantastic job with the man pages recently, and I certainly don't want to replace him. I think he should push into the kernel tree via git like all the other maintainers (for the relevant portions, obviously -- section 3, for example, doesn't make sense in the kernel tree.) -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
