Hi Geert,
thanks for your feedback!
Am 05.02.2024 um 21:10 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your patch!
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:32 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
When submitting a backport, please add lines like
commit 4bb0bd81ce5e97092dfda6a106d414b703ec0ee8 upstream.
Will do. I did wonder how the original commit could be found to prevent
duplicates...
On that note - Uli: would you prefer the entire backport series, or only
those you do not already have?
When we have several pending signals, have entered with the kernel
with large exception frame *and* have already built at least one
sigframe, regs->stkadj is going to be non-zero and regs->format/sr/pc
are going to be junk - the real values are in shifted exception stack
frame we'd built when putting together the first sigframe.
If that happens, subsequent sigframes are going to be garbage.
Not hard to fix - just need to find the "adjusted" frame first
and look for format/vector/sr/pc in it.
MSch: Minor v4.4 backport merge conflict fixes.
Please move this to "[MSch: ...] below...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YP2dBIAPTaVvHiZ6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
... i.e. here.
OK.
Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>
Good.
Please add your SoB on all patches you handle, some lack it.
That would have been the ones that did not need any extra handling. But
I take your point ...
Thanks a lot for taking care of this!
No matter!
Cheers,
Michael
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
