On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
This is why I am asking whether or not clang support is important or not for m68k. If you tell me it is not, then fine, I will remove all the asm (by the way, the patch is already ready). But if there are even a few users who care about clang for m68k, then I do not think we should penalize them and I would not sign-off a change which negatively impacts some users.
If clang support is important then clang's builtins are important. So why not improve those instead? That would resolve the issue in a win-win.
