Hi!
On 1/18/23 23:21, Michael Schmitz wrote:
libseccomp testsuite now fully passes on m68k, see attached.
Great - you haven't had a chance to compile the kernel selftest suite for seccomp though?
I haven't looked into this yet.
I wonder whether some of the 'architecture difference' skipped tests are related to the remaining seccomp_bpf self test faults??
I actually forgot to enable some tests on m68k in libseccomp.
After my most recent changes, there is a large number of tests being run now without errors.
https://github.com/glaubitz/libseccomp/tree/m68k
@Geert: Any chance you can approve the seccomp patches?
Now that we have m68k support for libseccomp, getting this merged is no longer purely academic.
Both Al Viro and Andreas Schwab had provided feedback and improvements - could you perhaps review
the latest version again (v13) if that's what is holding this up?
@Andreas: Please use my Github branch if you want to test libseccomp as well.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
