Hi Adrian,
On 18/01/23 22:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Michael!
On 1/18/23 09:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Good catch, thank you! I added the missing definitions and it builds
fine now.
Will test against a kernel with your patches now.
libseccomp testsuite now fully passes on m68k, see attached.
Great - you haven't had a chance to compile the kernel selftest suite
for seccomp though?
I wonder whether some of the 'architecture difference' skipped tests are
related to the remaining seccomp_bpf self test faults??
@Geert: Any chance you can approve the seccomp patches?
Now that we have m68k support for libseccomp, getting this merged is no
longer purely academic.
Both Al Viro and Andreas Schwab had provided feedback and improvements -
could you perhaps review the latest version again (v13) if that's what
is holding this up?
Cheers,
Michael
Thanks,
Adrian
