Re: [PATCH v13 0/3] Add kernel seccomp support for m68k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael!

On 1/14/23 01:00, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Unfortunately, libseccomp fails to build after I updated the
syscalls.csv file
after adding m68k support. It seems that the problem are a number of
syscalls
that exist on m68k only:

  CC       libseccomp_la-syscalls.perf.lo
syscalls.perf:152:70: error: '__PNR_getpagesize' undeclared here (not in
a function)
  152 |
getpagesize,119,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,166,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF,__PNR_getpagesize,SCMP_KV_UNDEF

That one also exists on alpha and sparc. The other two are indeed unique to m68k.

There must have been other cases of novel syscalls added to libseccomp before?

Neither alpha nor sparc are supported by libseccomp, so I think that's not an argument.

Adrian

--
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913





[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux