Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Pá 16. 08. 2013 v 23:57 +0200:
141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 17.09 seconds, 8.3 MB/s So nfhd is slower than emulated IDE?
nfhd is something like IDE with DMA (if everything is in buffer cache then it's doing basically just a memcpy() from cache to the destination place) - can't believe it would be that slow. Don't have profiling numbers at hand but one of the main purposes of nfhd was to be way way faster than the emulated IDE. Something must be seriously wrong somewhere. Petr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
