So far I never really used nfhd.
In a kernel that has both IDE and nfhd support, once everything is in the
buffer cache, I get:
atari:~# dd if=/dev/hda2 bs=1M of=/dev/null
134+1 records in
134+1 records out
141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 5.91 seconds, 23.9 MB/s
atari:~# dd if=/dev/nfhd8p2 bs=1M of=/dev/null
134+1 records in
134+1 records out
141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 17.09 seconds, 8.3 MB/s
So nfhd is slower than emulated IDE?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
