Re: nfhd performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Michael Schmitz
<schmitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In a kernel that has both IDE and nfhd support, once everything is in the
buffer cache, I get:

atari:~# dd if=/dev/hda2 bs=1M of=/dev/null
134+1 records in
134+1 records out
141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 5.91 seconds, 23.9 MB/s
atari:~# dd if=/dev/nfhd8p2 bs=1M of=/dev/null
134+1 records in
134+1 records out
141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 17.09 seconds, 8.3 MB/s

So nfhd is slower than emulated IDE?


That seems odd indeed ... is the disk attached as IDE or via USB adapter?
(Checking to see whether I should get similar results)

It's not a physical disk:

[IDE0]
Present = Yes
IsCDROM = No
ByteSwap = No
ReadOnly = No
Path = /scratch/geert/aranym/etch-m68k.img
Cylinders = 2102
Heads = 16
SectorsPerTrack = 63
ModelName = Sarge m68k

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux