On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
From what I understand, (And again I do not), the ESP sounds a lot like the NCR5380. I would craft a very similar copy of the new ESP stack, with it's central library and function-vector registration, The scsi-generic part is all there, in full glory. Then one concentrated effort should go into the basic/general chip programing, which lots of it could be ripped from current code, and the different platform implementation becomes one liners, if the new ESP stack is any indication.
I still do not understand the whole ESP driver but when I wrote mac_esp.c I learned the value of the layered structure it provided. I still have a lot to learn about the SCSI layers and the APIs too. I'm reading Documentation/scsi at the moment. If you know of any other introductory reading material, that would be a help.
From my passed experience, there becomes a source code state when a rewrite is less effort then any cleanup or enhancements. From the small changes I had to do to the xxx_NCR5380 family of drivers, my guts feeling scream "rewrite", so here I voice them. In the mid/long-term you will work much less. And be much more satisfied from the results.
This makes sense. Thanks for your feedback. Finn
Good lock Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html