… > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c … > @@ -185,9 +186,9 @@ static ssize_t lp5521_selftest(struct device *dev, > struct lp55xx_chip *chip = led->chip; > int ret; > > - mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > + guard(mutex, &chip->lock); How did you come to the conclusion to try such a syntax variant out? Would the following statement (with additional parentheses) be more appropriate? guard(mutex)(&chip->lock); Regards, Markus
