On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 29/12/2021 18:34, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:39:27 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Convert the LEDs bindings of Maxim MAX77693 MUIC to DT schema format. > >> The existing bindings were defined in ../bindings/mfd/max77693.txt. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml > >> > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.example.dt.yaml: led-controller@0: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]+-)?led[01]?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml > > > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77693.yaml > > > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1573762 > > > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch > > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > > > I updated my yamllint and dtschema, run with DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m but > still cannot reproduce it. Probably because I based on linux-next, so > maybe this was a fixed issue in leds/common.yaml. Are you setting DT_SCHEMA_FILES, because the error is in common.yaml but caused by this schema. Clearly, 'reg' is not defined here. And there is no change to common.yaml in next. Rob
