Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: leds: maxim,max77693: convert to dtschema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/12/2021 18:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:39:27 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Convert the LEDs bindings of Maxim MAX77693 MUIC to DT schema format.
>> The existing bindings were defined in ../bindings/mfd/max77693.txt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml         | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.example.dt.yaml: led-controller@0: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]+-)?led[01]?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/maxim,max77693.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77693.yaml
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1573762
> 
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
> 

I updated my yamllint and dtschema, run with DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m but
still cannot reproduce it. Probably because I based on linux-next, so
maybe this was a fixed issue in leds/common.yaml.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux