On Tue 2021-08-10 22:53:53, Marek Behún wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:53:35 +0200 > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Pavel, one point of the discussion is that in this case the LED is > > > controlled by MAC, not PHY. So the question is whether we want to do > > > "ethmacN" (in addition to "ethphyN"). > > > > Sorry, I missed that. I guess that yes, ethmacX is okay, too. > > > > Even better would be to find common term that could be used for both > > ethmacN and ethphyN and just use that. (Except that we want to avoid > > ethX). Maybe "ethportX" would be suitable? > > See > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/YQAlPrF2uu3Gr+0d@xxxxxxx/ > and > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210727172828.1529c764@thinkpad/ Ok, I guess I'd preffer all LEDs corresponding to one port to be grouped, but that may be hard to do. Best regards, Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
