On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:53:35 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Pavel, one point of the discussion is that in this case the LED is > > controlled by MAC, not PHY. So the question is whether we want to do > > "ethmacN" (in addition to "ethphyN"). > > Sorry, I missed that. I guess that yes, ethmacX is okay, too. > > Even better would be to find common term that could be used for both > ethmacN and ethphyN and just use that. (Except that we want to avoid > ethX). Maybe "ethportX" would be suitable? See https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/YQAlPrF2uu3Gr+0d@xxxxxxx/ and https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210727172828.1529c764@thinkpad/ Marek
