Hi! > > Yes, this still persists. But we really do not want to start > > introducing namespaces to the LED subsystem. > > Did we come to any conclusion? > > My preliminary r8169 implementation now creates the following LED names: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 26 22:50 r8169-led0-0300 -> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/r8169-led0-0300 So "r8159-0300:green:activity" would be closer to the naming we want, but lets not do that, we really want this to be similar to what others are doing, and that probably means "ethphy3:green:activity" AFAICT. Best regards, Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
