On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 12:58 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > > >> a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > > >> someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > >> > > >> In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > > >> in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > > >> (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > > >> flow? > > > > > > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that > > > important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because > > > you pushed a bit too hard. > > > > > > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, > > > LED subsystem is not orphaned. > > > > It is good to hear that you are still actively maintaining the LED > > subsystem, thank you. > > > > This thread does remind me that I was planning on re-sending this > > LED patch which seems to have fallen through the cracks: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20210221115208.105203-1-hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Can you pick this one up please? Or shall I resend it? > > Thanks, applied. Thank you, Pavel! Sorry for being a bit pushy. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
