Hi! > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > flow? To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that important to begin with, because of lacking explanation, and because you pushed a bit too hard. Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, LED subsystem is not orphaned. Best regards, Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
