On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 1:35 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: Thanks for your _prompt_ response! > > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > > > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > > flow? > To be honest, patches were not applied because they were not that > important to begin with, Reference counting disbalance is not critical, but what is then? > because of lacking explanation, According to the thread https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210529111935.3849707-1-andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u you haven't commented a word on them. Can you, please, elaborate? > and because > you pushed a bit too hard. Huh?! It was two month and nothing from you. Good that this thread does something about it. > Yes, I'm quite busy in -rc1 to -rc3 timeframe with stable reviews. No, > LED subsystem is not orphaned. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
